Determinant-Trace-Equation using Exterior Algebra
This post assumes knowledge of the basics of exterior algebra.
This is a short proof of the fact that, for any linear map , the equalityholds.
I was inspired to write this after seeing a 17-minute YouTube video where this equation was proven using matrix algebra. Noting how determinants are so much easier to define and manipulate in geometric algebra, or even exterior algebra (since we wonβt need the inner product here), I set out to find a shorter proof.
Preliminaries
Letβs look at some properties weβll need.
- The operator exponential has the derivative
- The scalar differential equation with initial condition has the unique solution .
- The trace of is given by, for any basis of ,where is the dual basis to , i.e. and
- (This is where the exterior algebra comes in:) The determinant of is given by the formulaThis formula is a rigorous version of the notion that βthe determinant measures how volume is scaled.β
- The derivative of an exterior product follows a product rule:
- is invertible, its inverse simply being , thus, for any basis , is also a basis.
I think all of these count as background knowledge and not part of the proof, so I wonβt prove them here. In fact, if I were to prove them, Iβd have to prove them using other facts, starting a spiral that would only end with me writing a whole textbook.
The proof
The main body of the proof is a big chain equality proving thatwhich, using the above definition of the determinant, can be rewritten towhich then just reduces towhich, substituting to see that , immediately implies that(compare fact 2 above)
Substituting finally results in the desired equality:
Now all that remains is to show equation . For that, first apply the product rule to getNow define for all , so that forms a basis (compare the final fact above). Thus, we can decompose into a linear combinationSubstitute that in to obtainNow note that the exterior product contains the repeated term if and only if , so all those terms vanish, leaving onlyNow it is easy to see that the first factor is just the definition of , so we finally have
β‘